In recent seismic events that occurred worldwide and in Peru, it has been observed that irregular structures in plan present greater structural damage compared to regular structures. Investigations carried out after seismic events indicate that irregular plan structures collapse due to erroneous structural conception and poor seismic analysis. Likewise, the Peruvian earthquake-resistant standard does not establish a permissible limit for the degree of irregularity under analysis, instead qualitatively assessing the structural irregularity. The objective of this article was to study the effect of plan irregularities using innovative methodologies on the structural response of tall 10-story reinforced concrete buildings. In this sense, seventeen (17) structural models are proposed that reflect different irregular configurations in plan: 06 structures Type L, 05 structures Type I, 05 structures Type I, and one regular building. These buildings are numerically modeled using ETABS software V.18.0 through modal analysis, Modal Spectral and Linear Time History (MSLTH), and Multi-Mode Pushover (MPA). For the MSLTH, seven (07) pairs of representative Peruvian earthquakes were analyzed. The results of the modal analysis evaluated in the first two vibration modes demonstrated that Type L irregular structures change their behavior from translational to torsional when the structures present an irregularity greater than 57%. Type I and O structures present translational behavior. Furthermore, the results of the Modal Spectral and MSLTH analysis demonstrate that Type L structures present greater displacements and drifts in both directions. The shear force and the overturning moment for Types L, I, and O decrease as the irregularity in plan increases. Finally, the results of the MPA for irregular Type L structures demonstrated that the lateral stiffness of the structures decreases as the irregularity in plan is critical, increasing the possibility of the formation of plastic mechanisms in the structural elements.
Loading....